Concerning some Issues of Negative Constructions in Georgian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55804/jtsu.15120473.2025.18.08Keywords:
negation, negative constructions, Georgian language, morpho-syntaxAbstract
The interaction of negative units in languages is an important issue on morpho-syntactic levels. The general classification reveals three types of languages: with single negation, double negation and negative concord. It is a widely accepted opinion, that Georgian is a language with negative concord, although the experiment showed that double negation is much more preferred for native-speakers.
The two peculiarities have been revealed while learning the negation in Georgian: I. If a negative word precedes the verb, then the verb can appear in either positive or negative form, while if the verb precedes the negative word, then it must be in negative form obligatorily; II. It is not allowed to split (to separate with positive form) the negative concord. The linguistic experiment of negative constructions in Georgian was performed at 23 young Georgian native speaker students. The given sentences were put in priority order depending on what was more acceptable for them individually. The ungrammatical constructions received special zero marking. The experiment was hold with EU standard ethic norms, and the informed consents were signed by the participants, who granted me the rights to use the material with any kind of scientific purposes. The presented experiment overviwed the three clasters of sentenses, and its results showed that the free word order, which is significant for the Georgian language, creates a very interesting case of a big number of acceptable variations. It is important, that this experiment confiremd the above mentioned two limitations for the negative constructions in modern Georgian. It should be said that, by the way, it would be quite interesting to reveal dialectal differences in terms of the production of negative constructions. Here it should be important to take into account different types of dialectal characteristics, which are reflected in the language with mirror-like asymmetry.
References
ადვაძე 2015: მ. ადვაძე, უარყოფის პრაგმატული ასპექტები სხვადასხვა სისტემის ენებში (ქართული და ინგლისური ენების მასალაზე დაყრდნობით), იაკობ გოგებაშვილის სახელობის თელავის სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტი, თელავი.
გოგიაშვილი 2019: ლ. გოგიაშვილი, უარყოფის გამოხატვის სემანტიკური ველი ქართლურში (სამაგისტრო ნაშრომი ქართველური ენათმეცნიერების მაგისტრის აკადემიური ხარისხის მოსაპოვებლად)
ვერლე 2002: A. Werle, A typology of negative indefinites, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
ვაუდენი 1994: T. Wouden, Negative contexts, PhD diss, University of Groningen.
ზეილსტრა 2004: H. Zeijlstra, Sentential Negation and Negative Concord, PhD Dissertation, University of Amsterdam, LOT Publications, Utrecht.
ზექალაშვილი, აბესაძე 2016: რ. ზექალაშვილი, მ. აბესაძე, უარყოფის ფუნქციურ-სემანტიკური მიკროველი ქართულ სალიტერატურო ენასა და დიალექტებში, ქუთაისის სამეცნიერო ბიბლიოთეკის წელიწდეული.VIII.
მიესტამო 2005: M. Miestamo, Standard negation: the negation of declarative verbal main clauses in a typological perspective, Mouton de Gruyter.
პაინი 1985: J. R. Payne, Negation, In: Language typology and syntactic description, ed. by T. Shopen, vol. 1, 197-242. Cambridge UP, Cambridge.
პფაუ, მახარობლიძე, ზეილსტრა 2022: R. Pfau, T. Makharoblidze, H. Zeijlstra, Negation and Negative Concord in Georgian Sign Language, Sec. Psychology of Language. Volume 13 – 2022, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.734845.
ქურდაძე, ლომია, მარგიანი, ჭუმბურიძე 2022: რ. ქურდაძე, მ. ლომია, ქ. მარგიანი, ნ. ჭუმბურიძე, უარყოფის კატეგორია ქართველურ ენებში, გამომცემლობა „უნივერსალი“,თბილისი.
იესპერსენი 1917: O. Jespersen, Negation in English and other languages, Cornell University Library.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The authors retain all rights. The authors grant a publisher the exclusive right to publish the work for the first time, but they do not assign ownership.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain all rights. The authors grant a publisher the exclusive right to publish the work for the first time, but they do not assign ownership.


