https://phasis.tsu.ge/index.php/PJ/issue/feedPHASIS2024-06-10T12:42:36+04:00Journal PHASISphasis@tsu.geOpen Journal Systems<p>Founded in 1999, <em>Phasis</em> is an academic journal published annually by the Institute of Classical, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies of the Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University. </p> <p><em>Phasis</em> publishes original contributions in all areas of Greek and Roman Studies, including literature, history, languages, philosophy, religion, art, and archaeology. The journal also welcomes submissions on the reception of the ancient world.</p> <p><em>Phasis</em> is a peer-reviewed journal, indexed in ERIH PLUS and Scopus. The journal publishes articles in English, German, and French.</p>https://phasis.tsu.ge/index.php/PJ/article/view/7866From Dioskurias / Aia (Ochamchire) over Sebastopolis / Dioskurias (Skurcha) to Sukhumi / Sebastopolis. The Letter of the Episcopus Sanastupolitanus Inferioris Georgiae Reconsidered2024-06-02T20:59:16+04:00Altay Coşkunacoskun@uwaterloo.ca<p>Traditionally, Dioskurias was equated with Sebastopolis and located at Sukhumi, although the literary and archaeological source base is rather slim and epigraphic and numismatic evidence is nearly absent. Recently, A. Coşkun (in <em>VDI</em> 80.2, 2020, 354-376; 80.3, 2020, 654-674) proposed to seek the location of Aia-Dioskurias near Ochamchire and its refoundation as Sebastopolis by Lake Skurcha. For this, he draws on the mythical and geographical traditions, which describe Aia and Dioskurias as situated in the “recess of the Black Sea.” River names and neighbouring tribes further suggest that the land- and riverscape of legendary Aia was developed from the environs of Dioskurias / Ochamchire. Ancient itineraries and <em>periplus</em> literature further seem to support this reconstruction. T. Schmitt (2022, 14-44) has tried to refute the new approach. After closely comparing the arguments and counter-arguments, Coşkun’s position can be further strengthened. Schmitt, however, adduces for the first time important Medieval evidence, including a letter of the <em>episcopus Sanastupolitanus inferioris Georgiae </em>(1330). But this is not sufficient to prove that Sebastopolis lies buried under Sukhumi. After exploring the context of Genoese colonial activities and king George V’s fight for independence from Ilkhanid and Mongol occupation, it will be suggested instead that the Catholic bishop of Sukhumi became the titular successor of the then defunct Orthodox bishopric of nearby Sebastopolis-Skurcha.</p>2024-07-02T00:00:00+04:00Copyright (c) 2023 PHASIShttps://phasis.tsu.ge/index.php/PJ/article/view/7869Eirenias of Miletus’ Career between the Attalids and the Seleucids2024-06-02T21:10:16+04:00Simone Rendinasimone.rendina@alumni.sns.it<p>The role played by Eirenias of Miletus in the mid-2<sup>nd</sup> century B.C. between his city and the Attalids and Seleucids demonstrates the vitality of his <em>polis</em>, which had de facto the status of a free city after the Treaty of Apamea of 188. A small corpu<em>s</em> of Milesian inscriptions shows that Eirenias, known only from epigraphy, dedicated most of his political activity to relations with external powers, playing numerous times the role of ambassador in favour of his city, for which he was able to obtain many privileges from the Attalids and, to a lesser extent, from the Seleucids. Notables such as Eirenias, who used their external relations for the benefit of their own cites, constituted the connecting element between the euergetism of kings and powerful outsiders and that of private citizens.</p>2024-07-02T00:00:00+04:00Copyright (c) 2023 PHASIShttps://phasis.tsu.ge/index.php/PJ/article/view/7871Finding Krateros. Exploring the Signatures on the Mosaics in the Roman Villa of Skala (Kefalonia)2024-06-02T21:17:00+04:00Nikki Vellidisnikki.vellidis@stx.ox.ac.uk<p>Mosaic signatures provide an incredible and unique view into a sector of the ancient world that is often difficult to access. These signatures are formulaic – utilizing similar vocabulary, grammar, and phrasing. Therefore, when a signature deviates from the so-called “norm,” the unique aspects of the inscription should be carefully considered. This article analyses the figure of Krateros, a possible mosaicist or patron mentioned in two lengthy mosaic inscriptions from an Imperial Period villa on the Greek island of Kefalonia. Krateros was traditionally believed to be a mosaicist with an elaborate signature. However, this conclusion has been debated, and his identity and relation to the mosaic and villa speculated. This article aims to provide Krateros with an identity that considers the plethora of information supplied in the inscriptions.</p>2024-07-26T00:00:00+04:00Copyright (c) 2023 PHASIS